Saturday, March 6, 2010

Channelling the Future

Unless you just got back from Cancun you will know that we had two budgets in the last week. One from the indebted BC government and one from the more indebted Federal Government.

There are links below for those who missed the high-lights. However, the gist is, small cuts that don't add up to much and hope the world economy and inflation pull out us out from under the pile of steaming debt.

I have found a way to channel future budget speeches and am going to give you a little snippet of a few of these.

2012 Federal Budget

Minister of Finance: " as you know, the renewed slow-down in China/US/Europe has caused our fiscal projections to be wrong (there that didn't hurt so much to say we were wrong) and so we have had lower tax receipts, while expenditures have gone up. Some of these expenditures have been from extending the UI eligibility, others were for increased Provincial transfers to prevent credit down-grades and higher borrowing costs. We have also had increased expenses from the entitlement programs of the baby-boomers and also from having to assume some liabilities of the CHMC due to the weakness in the housing market.

The result has been a ballooning of the deficit. The opposition want us to spend more and monetize out debt. Other countries have done this and have seen their currency devalued, and inflation take flight. The Conservative party is committed to fiscal responsibility so we reluctantly are forced to take drastic action. We will be cutting Provincial transfer payments (God help them), we will ask all departments to find 5-10% savings and increase certain taxes such as GST."

BC Provincial Budget 2012

BC Finance Minister: "Since the Federal Government has so irresponsibly cut our transfer payments by 20%, we are in a difficult fiscal situation. Their balance sheet looks better, but they have down-laoded the responsibility for making the tough decisions to the Provinces.

This is not helped by the fact that Health Care is now consuming $6 out of every $10 we spend due to our aging population.

We have had to look for ways of raising revenue in a difficult business environment. The NDP will not cut the basic services that our people need. Our research has shown that there are many in this Province who have significant wealth, acquired in other Provinces and even outside this country who live in multi-million dollar homes and pay very little income tax. Yet they use services. We have therefore decided to place a 'home value surcharge' until the fiscal situation improves. The amount will be 1% of the accessed value of homes over $1,000,000. If you can afford to live in a $2 Million dollar home, you can afford to contribute to the costs of society. Currently the burden falls mostly on middle income earners."

Federal Budget 2014

Federal Finance Minister: " This new government is committed to doing whatever it takes to get Canadians back to work and reverse the funding cuts of the last two years. We will achieve this by increasing taxes on corporations and high earners and we have instructed the Bank of Canada, under it's new Governor, to reverse the interest rate hikes of the last three years and to purchase Government bonds from the market if and when needed. The opposition says that such moves will cause investors to leave the sell the Canadian Dollar. The NDP has often said that the Canadian dollar is over-valued and has lead to a loss of manufacturing jobs. We do not fear such an event."


  1. Didn't the NDP try something like a Home value surcharge before?

  2. They did. Glen Clark's government I think. But the backlash from the RE industry and the house rich/cash poor, mostly retired folk made them pull it.

    Of course they are the same people that need services, so getting a reverse mortgage would have been a reasonable option, but it was killed quickly.

  3. So what your saying is, this wont end well?

    And all these years the MSM has been telling me that it will all be great.

    As sad as it is I really dont see any good way out of this. We need money. Cut spending or raise taxes, or both. Taxes hurt spending and businesses and cutting spending hurts everything in general as less money flowing means less jobs and a lower quality of life for everyone.

    The hyperinflation theory seems more plausible by the day.

  4. fish - check out Larry's numbers for today ;)

  5. Dang- that fits in nicely with my next post. Maybe up in a day or two.

  6. One way or another, the baby boomers are going to have to pay for their health care. The younger generations simply can't - they don't have the incomes, they don't have any savings and they are in debt up to their eyeballs. The boomers can only turn to themselves for a solution.

  7. Look at this ad for sheer audacity

    Rent our home, but keep it presentable and allow showings beause we are trying to sell it!

  8. Patiently Waiting:

    I dunno, I think one way or another I will end up paying for the boomers health care. If they dont have the money then they dont have the money. Taxing someone who is just collecting CPP and old age pension is no easy task. However taxing someone with a job and income is not all that tough.

    I wouldnt be terribly shocked if health care continues its downward spiral until we basically have wha the americans do now. Something like 60% of taxes go to health care and that will only get worse as the population gets older. Eventually the new generation cant pay for the older ones and things will fall apart.

  9. You still have to expert all of those other guitar chords so
    as to engage in very easy popular music. -- Notes:
    Bb D F. Once you know these scales, in all twelve keys, then
    you have a very solid foundation on which to learn how to play piano chords.

    Feel free to surf to my weblog; kailangan kita Piano chords and notes